[Solved]: How do I explain that a polynomial time reduction is in fact polynomial time?

Problem Detail: I have as an assignment question to show that $QuadSat={langlephiranglemidphi$ is a satisfiable 3CNF formula with at least 4 satisfying assignments$}$ is $sf NP$-Complete. My solution is as follows, which is pretty much copied almost 100% from a textbook example with only an extra requirement for satisfiablity at the end…

$$QuadSatleq_{p} Clique$$ Let $phi$ be a formula with k clauses such as $$phi=bigwedge_{1}^{k}(a_kvee b_kvee c_k)$$ The reduction $f$ generates the strong $langle G,krangle$, where $G$ is an undirected graph defined as follows: The nodes in $G$ are organized into $k$ groups of three nodes each called the textbf{triples}, $t_1, dots, t_k$. Each triple corresponds to one of the clauses in $phi$, and each node in a triple corresponds to a literal in the associated clause. Label each node of $G$ with its corresponding literal in $phi$. The edges of $G$ connect all but two types of pairs of nodes in $G$: No edge is present between nodes in the same triple, and no edge is present between two nodes with contradictory labels. $QuadSat$ is satisfiable if and only if the resulting graph $G$ contains four or more $k$-$cliques$. Each unique $k$-$clique$ in $G$ represents a set of satisfying assignments to $QuadSat$. The reduction runs in polynomial time, because the construction of the graph is a polynomial function; one pass through all the triples to create all the vertices for $V$, and one pass through the same triples to create the edges.

I feel like my explanation as to why my reduction is polynomial in time is severely weak, possibly bordering on wrong. How can I explain this better? And something else: I think this only proves that QuadSat is in NP, but not necessarily NP Complete. How can I prove this?

Asked By : agent154

Answered By : Shaull

Your reduction indeed shows that $QuadSATin NP$, since you showed a reduction to a problem in NP. Perhaps an easier way to have done this, is to simply show that there is a “short witness” for the membership of a formula in $QuadSAT$. In order to show NP-hardness, you must show a reduction from an NP-hard problem. A good candidate for that is $SAT$ (or $3SAT$).
Best Answer from StackOverflow

Question Source : http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/9806 3.2K people like this

 Download Related Notes/Documents